|
BrandLoop
#4, August 1997
Branding
in the Next Millennium
How
can we identify the features of the brands of the
next decade? Where will your competition come from
in the future? As we move into the 21st
century, there are a number of issues facing
brands, many of which are covered in other
BrandLoops. Through the Loop has been studying the
changing role of brands through its continuous
research programme. This BrandLoop considers some
of the attributes which new brands may possess and
which existing brands may need to adopt in order
to compete. Brands are multi-functional beyond the
product attributes so the question is how will
these functions and roles need to evolve? The
brand of the future will combine different
elements although the general principles of
branding are likely to remain constant. There are
new tools with which brands can be created. The
following is far from an exhaustive list and other
scenarios will be covered in later BrandLoops.
The
Shortening of the Product & Brand Life Cycle
There
is considerable evidence of the shortening of the
product and brand life cycle. To some extent this
is a factor of the intense competition in the
marketplace which means that new products have to
prove themselves very quickly or be delisted. We
are already seeing the launch of products that are
promoted as limited editions and are designed for
a short shelf-life. This is particularly important
in the impulse market where new product
development and associated promotional activity
are crucial in driving visibility at
point-of-sale. Short life-cycle products will also
require quick payback. Successful brands of this
sort will make profits and then disappear or be
quickly updated and reinvented.
Hyper-Segmentation
As
we move from mass marketing to mass customisation
we move through hyper-segmentation. This refers to
many brand variants, each targeted at small,
distinct groups of consumers. The brand remains
constant representing an endorsement of the
product through its associated values. This goes
beyond straight demographics. Which variant of the
product is right for your lifestyle, occasion or
mood at the time?
Brand
extension will enable the brand equity to be
leveraged within the product category. The brand
provides the frame of reference for the consumer.
However, it should not be at the expense of true
innovation and cross-category opportunism.
The
Brand Experience
A
brand represents an experience for consumers and,
as such, becomes less associated with an
individual product or service than the brand
values. Under this scenario, a company's
manufacturing competencies become less relevant
than its ability to understand consumers and to
manage a brand. Production can always be
outsourced. In practice, it means that a brand can
be extended across seemingly unrelated product and
service categories if it maintains the same core
brand values. The most obvious example of this is
the Virgin
brand which started in record retailing, moved
into the associated areas of record company, film
and video before the first significant strategic
discontinuity with the launch of Virgin Atlantic.
Since then, the brand has been extended into soft
drinks, vodka, television and radio, financial
services, rail travel, clothing and cosmetics. One
of the pioneers in the development of the
cross-category brand is Disney
where the brand has been moved from films into
theme parks, video, retail, television and,
through partnerships and merchandising agreements,
food and drink, toys, etc.
Within
the media market there has been a sustained shift
away from media owners working within individual
channels towards the development of experience
brands that can run across the different forms of
communications or product and service categories.
This is a clear response to the fragmentation of
media channels and allows the brand owner to
develop a brand or brands for these different
channels as well as develop products and services
that can exploit the brand values. The experience
brand becomes more important than the channel. One
feature of this development is that a media brand
may be extended into channels which are not
traditional or "new" media, e.g. events,
cafés, etc. This will provide new opportunities
for advertisers to have their brand displayed
within a new environment but with a familiar media
brand name. Within products and services,
Cosmopolitan in the UK, for example, has extended
its brand beyond the printed page and the Web site
into clothing retailing, confectionery and soft
drinks. In the UK this development was aided by a
relaxation in laws covering cross-media ownership.
Marketers
now have to question their own brand values to see
if they are applicable to other categories. Brand
equity should be carefully measured and managed to
evaluate current positioning as well as identify
and leverage new opportunities.
Alternative
Distribution and Communications Channels
We
are already seeing the development of a number of
products and brands that are choosing to avoid
traditional retail and promotional channels in
favour of a new approach. This results from the
increasing difficulty of selling through
traditional, mass-market channels where
competition for shelf-space is intense and, in
some markets, where the retailer has become very
powerful and is the frame of reference for the
consumer ahead of the manufacturer's brand. At the
same time, marketers are looking for greater
efficiency and accountability in their
communications and so are moving towards
communications channels where effectiveness can be
more accurately demonstrated.
We
will see a new generation of brands that do not
rely on channels of mass distribution or
heavyweight advertising campaigns. The original
development of Snapple
is a good example here and the brand experienced
difficulties when it tried to become more
mainstream. More recently, Christian Dior promotes
a perfume called Dune with a Web site which allows
it to capture consumer data. In the same market,
Unilever’s launch of cKone through
non-traditional communications and distribution
channels was described as an "un-Unilever-like
thing to do." There are a number of brands,
for example Durex,
where the Web represents the lead communications
channel within the global strategy. Consumers’
acceptance of home shopping offers the potential
for many manufacturers to offer a direct service
avoiding retail outlets altogether. This is
witnessed by the pioneering brands First Direct
and Direct Line Insurance. These two brands have
provided a model for future customer relationships
in the financial services sector. The Internet is
a global communications and distribution medium
and has the potential to have a substantial impact
not just on communications but also on the
distribution of many goods and services.
The
Differentiated Brand
Different
brands will need to use different forms of
differentiation and for different consumers. There
will also be a trade-off between short-term
competitive advantage and long-term
differentiation. Service aspects will be the key
to securing brand differentiation in the future.
The commodity nature of the petrol retailing
market, for example, clearly needs an initiative
that makes one brand stand apart from the rest.
This could be checking the oil or washing the car
windows or employing a customer representative to
help drivers with directions, avoiding road works
and other traffic problems that day.
Branding
is about providing a means of differentiation.
This will become increasingly vital as the market
and, in particular, the competitive situation
evolve. Sustained differentiation will also enable
a strong defence against me-too products. A low
price may become less a means of discrimination
than currently. Information about pricing will be
more easily available, even automated through
intelligent agents. A low price policy contradicts
brand building. Companies that opt for a low price
strategy will find that short-term volume gains
will be at the expense of longer term
profitability. Furthermore, not only will there be
less funds available for investment but the brand
will be devalued in the longer term. For a market
leader this is especially so. Negative marketing
will have an adverse impact on the brand.
However,
this does not mean that pricing is not important.
A company must continually review its pricing and
evaluate the price/value equation. If a brand is
charging a price premium over own label, the
"value" of this must be justified.
Sudden and deep changes are less advisable than
continuous evaluation and adjustment.
Nevertheless, pricing can be still used to
differentiate. For example, there may be tiered
pricing for different consumers or for different
service levels. This may be a subscription TV
channel where the cost of the subscription is
dependent on the amount of advertising received.
The
Consumer-Focused Brand
Marketing
has always been about focusing on consumers.
However, while marketing has previously only been
able to use mass-marketing techniques to reach
large groups of consumers, the current and
evolving market scenario requires reaching
individual consumers. Their different needs and
aspirations must be recognised. The brand that is
most successful will be the one that is most
accurately able to satisfy the needs of individual
consumers, meet and even surpass consumers'
expectations. This will enable it to rise above
those brands that do not have a genuine consumer
orientation.
The
consumer has become marketing-literate. The role
of mass media advertising is changing but will
still exist alongside evolving communications
channels. Under this scenario, consumers will
respond to a company which is genuinely interested
in them and will take part in a dialogue. A
company and brand’s response to the consumer
must be instant and appropriate. Companies will
need to develop systems that enable them to learn
about individual consumers and communications
tools that allow them to communicate on an
individual basis. A retailer should understand a
consumer’s shopping habits and then tailor its
offer. A manufacturer may wish to open a direct
consumer dialogue rather than relying on the
retailer as the consumer point of contact. We are
moving from the four Ps of mass marketing to the
one C, the consumer, of relationship marketing.
Summary
Branding
is currently at a crucial phase. The core
principles of branding will remain the same but
the actual execution of brand strategy will evolve
to suit the changing consumer and the changing
marketplace. This may involve re-evaluating the
brand across all its different aspects. A brand
will have to be benchmarked against the needs of
the consumer within the framework of the
marketplace.
Brands
will continue to add value, expanding the offer
well beyond products and services. They will need
to be managed more closely than before. Brand
equity, its limitations and opportunities, will
have to be fully understood. The value proposition
will become all the more important at a time of
immense retail own label pressure. Most of all,
brands will have to focus on consumer needs and
desires. Consistent quality, understood value and
a closeness to the consumer are the key attributes
for the successful brand.
|